Title:چرا نیویورک باید از طراحی بی عیب و نقص سنگاپور درس بگیرد؟

آیا می خواهید بیاموزید که چگونه طراحی شهری می تواند یک شهر را زیست پذیرتر، پایدارتر و رقابتی تر کند؟ آیا می خواهید ببینید که دو شهر از معروف ترین و تاثیرگذارترین شهرهای جهان چگونه در طراحی شهری خود با هم مقایسه و تضاد دارند؟ آیا می خواهید برخی از بهترین روش ها و درس هایی را که نیویورک می تواند از طراحی بی عیب و نقص سنگاپور بیاموزد، کشف کنید؟ اگر پاسخ شما به هر یک از این سوالات مثبت است، پس این ویدیو برای شما مناسب است. در این ویدئو، ما بررسی خواهیم کرد که چرا نیویورک باید از طراحی بی عیب و نقص سنگاپور درس بگیرد. ما طراحی شهری این دو شهر را از نظر حمل و نقل عمومی، فضای سبز، حاکمیت و سیاست ها مقایسه و مقایسه خواهیم کرد. ما نشان خواهیم داد که چگونه اصول و شیوه های طراحی شهری سنگاپور می تواند به نیویورک در بهبود زیست پذیری، پایداری و رقابت پذیری آن کمک کند. طراحی شهری فرآیند شکل دادن به جنبه های کالبدی و اجتماعی یک شهر است تا آن را زیست پذیرتر، پایدارتر و جذاب تر کند. این شامل برنامه ریزی، طراحی و مدیریت ساختمان ها، خیابان ها، پارک ها، فضاهای عمومی و زیرساخت های یک شهر است. طراحی شهری بر نحوه تجربه و تعامل ما با محیط شهری خود تأثیر می گذارد. بر سلامتی، شادی، بهره وری و رفاه ما تأثیر می گذارد. با این حال، همه شهرها به یک اندازه طراحی نشده اند. برخی از شهرها به دلیل طراحی شهری ضعیف یا قدیمی با چالش ها و مشکلات زیادی روبرو هستند. یکی از این شهرهای نیویورک است. نیویورک یکی از مشهورترین و تاثیرگذارترین شهرهای جهان است. این مرکز جهانی فرهنگی، مالی، رسانه ای و سرگرمی است. همچنین خانه بیش از ۸ میلیون نفر از پیشینه ها و فرهنگ های مختلف است. با این حال، نیویورک نیز از بسیاری از مسائل مربوط به طراحی شهری رنج می برد. سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی آن ناکارآمد، غیرقابل اعتماد و گران است. سرسبزی و تنوع زیستی آن محدود، توزیع نابرابر و در معرض تهدید است. حاکمیت و سیاست های آن اغلب کوته بینانه، واکنشی و تفرقه انگیز است. از سوی دیگر، برخی از شهرها در طراحی شهری خود برتر هستند. یکی از این شهرها سنگاپور است. سنگاپور به طور گسترده به عنوان یکی از بهترین نمونه های طراحی شهری در جهان شناخته می شود. سنگاپور یک کشور جزیره ای کوچک با جمعیتی در حدود ۵٫۷ میلیون نفر است. این مرکز جهانی تجارت، مالی، فناوری و نوآوری است. همچنین به دلیل چندفرهنگی بودن، ثبات و کیفیت زندگی خود شناخته شده است. سنگاپور در طراحی شهری خود به موفقیت های چشمگیری دست یافته است. سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی آن یکپارچه، خوب برنامه ریزی شده و کاربرپسند است. سرسبزی و تنوع زیستی آن فراوان، متنوع، به خوبی نگهداری شده و چند منظوره است. حاکمیت و سیاست های آن رویایی، پیشگیرانه، مشارکتی، نوآورانه و موثر است. با دیدن این ویدئو با این دو شهر و طراحی شهری آنها بیشتر آشنا می شوید. همچنین توصیه ها و پیشنهادهایی برای نیویورک دریافت خواهید کرد تا برخی از استراتژی ها یا راه حل های طراحی شهری سنگاپور را اتخاذ یا تطبیق دهد. پس با ما همراه باشید و بیایید به این موضوع جذاب بپردازیم. #سنگاپور #نیویورک #طراحی شهری ◦𝗣𝗔𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗢𝗡 برای دسترسی به منابعی که برای ویدیو استفاده می کنیم، در موضوعات بحث جاری و موارد دیگر شرکت کنید. https://www.patreon.com/UrbanFutures

◦𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗖𝗞 𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗢𝗧𝗛 چگونه سنگاپور به سبزترین شهر جهان تبدیل شد ↪https://youtu.be/GcoPvrRn9_s

چگونه بلندترین ساختمان جهان افق دبی را تغییر می دهد ↪https://youtu.be/Yko4KQhD9Y4

از برنامه ریزی شهری تا املاک و مستغلات: درون تکامل توکیو به یک شهر جهانی پایدار ↪https://youtu.be/U3ssF8gCh30

▷ اگر ما را دوست دارید، می توانید مشترک شوید! @urbanfutures همه ویدیوهای برنامه ریزی و طراحی شهری نه تنها از دوچرخه، شهر زیبا، کانال های The B1M و Wendover Productions الهام گرفته شده اند. شهر سبز سنگاپور، دگرگونی های نیویورک، سنگاپور و نیویورک، چالش های سبز سنگاپور، حمل و نقل عمومی سنگاپور، حمل و نقل عمومی نیویورک، پایداری و زیست پذیری سنگاپور، طراحی شهری نیویورک، چرا نیویورک باید از طراحی بی عیب و نقص سنگاپور درس بگیرد، طراحی شهری سنگاپور ، برنامه ریزی شهری نیویورک، برنامه ریزی شهری سنگاپور، طراحی بی عیب و نقص سنگاپور، اصول طراحی شهری سنگاپور، چالش های نیویورک، سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی، کارایی و دسترسی نیویورک، مقرون به صرفه بودن سنگاپور و یارانه ها، سبزی سنگاپور و تنوع زیستی، کاهش تغییرات آب و هوایی سنگاپور، کاهش تغییرات آب و هوایی سنگاپور، حاکمیت و سیاست ها، زیست پذیری و پایداری سنگاپور. ۰۰:۰۰ مقدمه ۰۲:۳۵ حمل و نقل عمومی ۰۶:۵۳ طراحی شهری و سبزه ۰۹:۱۲ حکمرانی و سیاست های شهری ۱۱:۱۰ نتیجه گیری © ۲۰۲۳ Urban Futures

قسمتي از متن فيلم: Imagine living in a city where you can get around easily by public transport, enjoy the greenery and nature in every corner, and benefit from the visionary and innovative policies of your government. Sounds like a dream, right? Well, for the residents of Singapore, this is a reality.

Singapore is widely regarded as one of the best examples of urban design in the world. Urban design is the process of shaping the physical and social aspects of a city to make it more livable, sustainable, and attractive. It involves planning, designing, and managing the buildings, streets, parks, public spaces,

And infrastructure of a city. Urban design affects how we experience and interact with our urban environment. It influences our health, happiness, productivity, and well-being. But not all cities are designed equally. Some cities face many challenges and problems due to poor or outdated urban design. One such city is New York.

New York is one of the most famous and influential cities in the world. It is a global center of culture, finance, media, and entertainment. It is also home to more than 8 million people from diverse backgrounds and cultures. However, New York also suffers from many issues related to urban design.

Its public transportation system is inefficient, unreliable, and expensive. Its greenery and biodiversity are limited, unevenly distributed, and under threat. Its governance and policies are often short-sighted, reactive, and divisive. In this video, we will explore why New York needs to learn from Singapore’s flawless design.

We will compare and contrast the urban design of these two cities in terms of public transportation, greenery, governance and policies. We will show how Singapore’s urban design principles and practices can help New York improve its livability, sustainability, and competitiveness.

We will also provide some recommendations and suggestions for New York to adopt or adapt some of Singapore’s urban design strategies or solutions. So stay tuned and let’s dive into this fascinating topic. Public transportation is one of the most essential aspects of urban design, affecting how people

Move around the city, how much time and money they spend on travel, how safe and comfortable they feel, and how much they contribute to the environment. A good public transportation system should be efficient, accessible, and affordable. However, not all cities have good public transportation systems, and there is a huge gap between cities

Like New York and Singapore in this regard. New York’s public transportation system is outdated, fragmented, and unreliable, ranking 23rd out of 27 major cities in the world in terms of efficiency. Its subway system is over 100 years old and suffers from frequent delays, breakdowns, and overcrowding.

Its bus system is slow and unreliable due to traffic jams and poor management. Its commuter rail system is expensive and underutilized. In contrast, Singapore’s public transportation system is one of the most efficient in the world, ranking 3rd out of 27 major cities in terms of efficiency.

Its subway system is modern and well-maintained, with trains running every few minutes and arriving on time. Its bus system is fast and reliable, with dedicated lanes and smart technology. Its commuter rail system is affordable and convenient, connecting the city with the suburbs and neighboring countries.

Accessibility is another key aspect of a good public transportation system. New York’s public transportation system is not very accessible, with its subway system not covering many parts of the city, especially in the outer boroughs and low-income neighborhoods. Its bus system does not operate 24/7 and has limited routes and stops.

Its commuter rail system does not integrate well with other modes of transport. It is also not very inclusive for people with disabilities or special needs, with only about a quarter of its subway stations being wheelchair-accessible. In contrast, Singapore’s public transportation system is very accessible.

Its subway system covers almost every part of the city, reaching both urban and rural areas. Its bus system operates 24/7 and has extensive routes and stops. Its commuter rail system integrates seamlessly with other modes of transport. It is also very inclusive for people with disabilities or special needs, with all of

Its subway stations being wheelchair-accessible, and most of its buses and trains having facilities and information for people with disabilities or special needs. Finally, affordability is an important factor for public transportation users. New York’s public transportation system is not very affordable, with subway and bus fares

Among the highest in the world, costing $2.75 per ride. Its commuter rail fares are also expensive, varying by distance and time. Its public transportation system does not offer many subsidies or discounts for low-income or vulnerable groups, such as students, seniors, or veterans.

Its public transportation system is also heavily dependent on taxes and debt for its funding, which makes it vulnerable to budget cuts and deficits. On the other hand, Singapore’s public transportation system is very affordable, with subway and bus fares among the lowest in the world, ranging from $0.77 to $2.02 per ride.

Its commuter rail fares are also reasonable, varying by distance and time. Its public transportation system offers many subsidies or discounts for low-income or vulnerable groups, such as students, seniors, or persons with disabilities. Its public transportation system is also largely self-financed by its operators, making it more resilient and efficient.

Urban design must include greenery to enhance the beauty and benefits of nature, preserve and enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services, offer green space and recreation opportunities, and mitigate and adapt to climate change. While Singapore boasts abundant, diverse, well-maintained, and multifunctional greenery, New York’s greenery is scarce, homogeneous, neglected, and underutilized.

Let’s compare and contrast the greenery and biodiversity of these two cities in terms of quantity, quality, distribution, and function. Quantity-wise, New York’s greenery and biodiversity are limited. Its vegetation cover is only about 21 percent of its land area, and its species richness is about 2,000 native plants and animals.

Singapore’s greenery and biodiversity, on the other hand, are impressive in quantity, with vegetation cover about 47 percent of its land area, and species richness of about 40,000 native plants and animals. Quality-wise, New York’s greenery and biodiversity are low quality, with a limited variety of

Species, mostly consisting of non-native and invasive plants and animals, often unhealthy, damaged, or diseased. In contrast, Singapore’s greenery and biodiversity are of high quality, with a rich variety of species, including many native and endemic plants and animals, healthy, resilient, and adaptive to the tropical climate and urban conditions, and well-maintained.

Distribution-wise, New York’s greenery and biodiversity are unevenly and poorly distributed across the city, with a high degree of land use and urban density, leading to unequal access to green space, especially for low-income and minority neighborhoods. In contrast, Singapore’s greenery and biodiversity are evenly and widely distributed across the

City, with a low degree of land use and urban density, guided by a long-term vision and a holistic approach, providing equal access to green space for all neighborhoods, regardless of income or ethnicity. Urban governance and policies are crucial to urban design.

They determine how a city is managed, regulated, and led, and affect stakeholder collaboration, problem-solving, and opportunity exploitation. Effective governance and policies are essential for good urban design, and should be visionary, proactive, collaborative, innovative, and efficient. However, there is a significant disparity between New York and Singapore in terms of governance and policies.

New York’s governance and policies are short-sighted, reactive, divisive, conservative, and inefficient, while Singapore’s governance and policies are visionary, proactive, collaborative, innovative, and effective. The differences between the two cities can be compared and contrasted in terms of vision, leadership, collaboration, innovation, and implementation.

New York lacks a comprehensive and coherent master plan for its urban development, and its vision is often influenced by short-term political agendas or market forces. Singapore’s vision for its urban design is clear, consistent, and well-aligned with its values and challenges. New York’s complex and fragmented system of authorities and institutions often creates

Confusion, duplication, and inefficiency, while Singapore’s simple and unified system of authorities and institutions creates clarity, coordination, and efficiency. New York’s collaboration for its urban design is limited, inaccessible, or biased, and often faces resistance, opposition, or conflict from stakeholders and partners. Singapore’s collaboration for its urban design is diverse, accessible, and inclusive, and

Often enjoys support, cooperation, or partnership from stakeholders and partners. We have come to the end of this video, where we explored why New York needs to learn from Singapore’s flawless design. We compared and contrasted the urban design of these two cities in terms of public transportation, greenery, governance and policies.

We showed how Singapore’s urban design principles and practices can help New York improve its livability, sustainability, and competitiveness. Learning from Singapore’s urban design can benefit New York in many ways. It can enhance the mobility and equity of its residents by providing them with efficient, accessible, affordable, safe, and environmentally friendly public transportation.

It can improve the health and happiness of its residents by providing them with abundant, diverse, well-maintained, and multifunctional greenery and biodiversity. It can boost the productivity and innovation of its residents by providing them with visionary, proactive, collaborative, innovative, and effective governance and policies.

Of course, New York cannot simply copy or transplant Singapore’s urban design solutions. New York has its own unique history, culture, geography, and challenges. However, New York can adopt or adapt some of Singapore’s urban design strategies or solutions that are relevant and applicable to its context.

For example, New York can invest more in upgrading and expanding its public transportation system. It can create more green spaces and corridors in its urban fabric. It can develop a long-term and holistic master plan for its urban development. It can engage and consult its stakeholders and partners more actively and meaningfully

For its urban design decisions. We hope you enjoyed this video and learned something new. If you did, please give us a thumbs up and subscribe to our channel for more videos like this. Also, feel free to share your thoughts and opinions in the comments section below. We would love to hear from you.

Thank you for watching and see you next time.

ID: GHgb3heQxqU
Time: 1682276406
Date: 2023-04-23 23:30:06
Duration: 00:13:27

منبع