Title: اسپیکر سری شماره ۱۶ | طراحی مشترک بازیابی ارتجاعی در شهرها

شانزدهمین نسخه از سری شهرها در خط مقدم اهمیت اولویت دادن به بازیابی سبز تاب آور در شهرها را در شرایطی که آنها با بحران جاری کووید-۱۹ مواجه هستند، مورد بحث قرار داد. همه‌گیری سیستم‌های اقتصادی، زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی در سراسر جهان را به روش‌های بی‌سابقه‌ای به چالش کشیده است و آسیب‌پذیری‌های جدیدی را آشکار می‌کند و در عین حال استرس‌های زمینه‌ای را ترکیب می‌کند. فلیکس دولر، میزبان مشترک این جلسه و رئیس بخش توسعه شهری در Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)، در این جلسه بیان کرد، شهرها باید به عنوان یک فرصت منحصر به فرد برای دگرگونی و ایجاد سود مضاعف برای مقابله با مشکلات کوتاه مدت، بهبودی را در نظر بگیرند. اقدامات پاسخ مدت به کووید-۱۹ در حالی که جهت گیری بازسازی اقتصادی را به روشی پایدار انجام می دهد. سو جین کیم، رئیس بخش سیاست‌ها و بررسی‌های شهری در OECD، گفت‌وگو را با تاکید بر اینکه بهبودی نشان‌دهنده همه‌گیری کووید-۱۹ بسیار ناهموار است، زیرا بحران به‌صورت نامتقارن شهرها را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد، گفتگو را آغاز کرد. با این حال، او ابراز امیدواری کرد که حتی زمانی که بحران نقاط ضعف و نابرابری‌ها را آشکار کرد، منجر به تسریع انتقال‌های بزرگی شد که قبلاً به سمت شهرهای هوشمندتر، سبزتر و فراگیرتر در جریان بود، به دلیل نیاز فوری به ایجاد سیستم‌های انعطاف‌پذیرتر در آماده سازی برای شوک ها و استرس های آینده او مداخله خود را با اذعان به اینکه در حالی که ما در مسیر درست حرکت می‌کنیم، هنوز کارهای زیادی برای انجام دادن وجود دارد و بدون تعامل و هماهنگی مناسب با دولت‌های محلی و منطقه‌ای به اهداف کلیدی دست پیدا نمی‌کنند، پایان داد. دکتر اندرو مککللند، همکار پژوهشی دانشگاه منچستر، بحث را با به اشتراک گذاشتن یک مرور کلی از درس‌ها و یافته‌های اصلی منچستر در مورد کووید-۱۹ با مشارکت شبکه شهرهای تاب‌آور، و توسعه یک چارچوب بهبودی که بیشتر متمرکز بود، ادامه داد. در مورد دولت های محلی و سازمان های محلی در سراسر جهان. برخی از مهم‌ترین درس‌هایی که در این کار شناسایی شده‌اند، در نظر گرفتن چگونگی سرمایه‌گذاری در اقتصاد دایره‌ای برای ارتقای شهرهای سالم‌تر و تاب‌آورتر و در نظر گرفتن مدل‌های جدید بودجه برای افزایش بازیابی و تاب‌آوری شهر است. ایلاریا جولیانی، معاون رئیس بخش تاب آوری، اداره انتقال محیط زیست، شهرداری میلان، تجربه میلان در برخورد با اثرات همه گیری کووید-۱۹ و تلاش هایی را که برای غلبه بر آن انجام شده است، مورد بحث قرار داد. آنها تلاش های خود را بر پیش بینی مرحله پس از اورژانس متمرکز کرده اند تا اثرات و اختلالات مرحله “بعد” را کاهش دهند و در عین حال به درازمدت فکر کنند و به طور خاص به آنچه می توان از این تجربه آموخت و چگونه آموخت. این شهر می تواند در برابر شوک های اپیدمی آینده انعطاف پذیری ایجاد کند. یکی از اقدامات کلیدی که میلان انجام داده است، انتشار استراتژی انطباق ۲۰۲۰ میلان است که توسط سایر استراتژی‌های موجود شهر به عنوان نقطه شروعی برای بازنگری و چارچوب‌بندی مجدد اقدامات واقعی برای رویارویی با همه‌گیری با رویکردی کلی‌نگر اعلام شده است. پنج هدف عرضی که میلان بر آنها تمرکز کرده است شامل برابری، دسترسی، طبیعی‌سازی مجدد، کربن‌زدایی و مشارکت فعال است. Nazmul Huq، رئیس برنامه توسعه تاب‌آور در ICLEI، جلسه را با به اشتراک گذاشتن برخی از کارهایی که ICLEI برای رهبری بهبودهای تاب‌آور در سراسر جهان انجام داده است، به پایان رساند. به عنوان مثال، او کار انجام شده در رواندا را به عنوان بخشی از برنامه ReCAP21 با مشارکت شبکه Cites Resilient و Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) مورد بحث قرار داد، جایی که آنها در حال اجرای چراغ های خیابانی خورشیدی در مقابل مراکز بهداشتی برای افزایش ایمنی و امنیت هستند. در شب با افزودن ریکاوری سبز و مزایای ارتجاعی. او همچنین برخی از اهداف کلیدی را که شهرها برای ایجاد تاب‌آوری اقلیمی و بازیابی سبز باید روی آن‌ها تمرکز کنند، از جمله: همسوسازی اهداف تاب‌آوری محلی و جهانی، رسیدن به آسیب‌پذیری صفر، جمع‌آوری معیارهای محلی تاب‌آوری (درک زمینه‌ای) و بهبود نظارت، گزارش‌دهی و تعدیل به اشتراک گذاشت. . در نهایت، او بر اهمیت رساندن این درس‌های محلی به سطح جهانی برای مقیاس‌پذیری تأثیر و ایجاد تلاش جهانی برای سازگاری و انعطاف‌پذیری بهتر تأکید کرد. اطلاعات بیشتر درباره Cities on The Frontline: https://resilientcitiesnetwork.org/programs/cities-on-the-frontline-speaker-series/

اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد Recovery Framework: https://www.alliancembs.manchester.ac.uk/research/recovery-renewal-resilience-from-covid-19/

قسمتي از متن فيلم: Welcome to cities on the front line today we’ll talk about resilient recovery and learning from kovind 19. my name is frances geske i’m the practice manager for urban development and disaster risk management at the world bank for the east asia region and i’m your co-host for this speaker series on behalf of the

World bank uh lauren i had a conflict so donna will actually introduce the topic of our five guest speakers in a minute but before we start let me as is now tradition remind everyone of the intention of the speaker series underground rule for the conversation the purpose of these webinars is to have

Open and honest learning conversations the calls are not on the record and we ask that you not attribute any comment unless you have the person’s express permission to do so we will help you obtain this permission if needed we have about 450 people registered for the call today so

To facilitate the discussion we ask that you use the q a function or the chat function to ask questions or provide comments please note that the recording of this session as well as any powerpoint presentation will be made available online uh starting next monday and uh over to you

Good morning everyone my name is dan omran and it’s a pleasure to be co-hosting uh this session today on behalf of brazilian cities network uh we are very excited to be jumping into a session with lots of great speakers today today’s session is a co-host also by uh the german agency for international

Cooperation who are helping to partner with us and our ixley on a program around planning for a resilient recovery in three countries in mauritania and bangladesh and rwanda so as we’ve embarked on this work we’ve been doing a lot of deep thinking as a group of partners on what it means to be

Co-designing a resilient recovery in partnership with city governments um so felix dollar from giz uh will co-host staying the session and will be starting kicking us off with some remarks i will also be joined by several other speakers including sujin sujin kim who’s the head of the urban

Policies and reviews unit at deputy head for cities urban policies and sustainable development at the oacd um our second speaker after su jin will be uh dr andrew mcclelland a research associate at the university of manchester um the third speaker will be eliara giuliani deputy chief resilience officer and the environment from the

Environmental transition department at the municipality of milan and finally our partners from ikley will be represented through dr nasmul huck who is the head of brazilian development program at igle and so we’re very excited for a robust conversation today uh i’ll hand it off to you felix to kick us off and

Looking forward to hearing more from all of you thank you thank you very much donna my name is felix stuhler i’m the head of component on climate and finance in the sector program cities of giset in bonn we advise the german federal ministry for economic cooperation and development bmz

The division in charge of cities mobility and circular economy on everything urban you might say my specific angles are municipal finance climate protection and adaptation local implementation of global agendas and also urban resilience beyond our policy advisory work we actively stay in touch with our projects in cities all over the world

Some 20 to 30 percent of giz projects can be considered urban it’s a particular honor to cause this webinar as we’ve been working to raise the issue of green recovery and resilience in cities for a while now urban resilience in the narrower sense of climate and disaster resilience had

Already gained acknowledgement in the international climate debate and also in our work with the last year’s pandemic we saw an opportunity rising to widen the angle and as most of you who are joining this call as listeners and contributors you’ve been we’ve been asking ourselves what roles can city play cities play in

Shaping sustainable reconstruction after the corporate 19 crisis what can they do in the short term in the long term and what can we do as an organization to help them and was obvious cities at the beginning of the pandemic were on the front line as communicators as crisis managers they were

Hit hard as service providers losing important revenues during lockdown and they have to had to reorganize themselves so our question was how can we potentially support cities green recovery and their role as key actors um some preliminary answers was of course to to use the crisis as an opportunity for transformation

To look at government stimulus packages that that might be channeled in a more integrated and Sustainable way at the city level but we’ve seen some limitations to this um and um yeah and to to to work in city planning and uh and city economy towards a double dividend of coupling short-term response measures uh to covet 19 with a sustainable orientation of the economic reconstruction

So when we looked around of what we could do we saw many able actors already firstly brazilian cities network our cities as a pool of expertise and was very clear they they they are playing an important role um uh for knowledge transfer and to transfer knowledge from peer-to-peer

And this webinar series together with with the world bank uh was obviously already a very important contribution in the sense um but also it’s i mean um the city level itself is very important and it’s to understand the implications for your own city it’s always very important to understand a

Comprehensive case so i’m also looking forward to the contribution for milan to have this um this this detailed example um that one can refer to and then also What’s very important obviously is the the frameworks and um in the sense i’m looking forward to the oecd presentation where are the right frameworks set what what can we learn from pandemic pandemic responses in different countries at the city level for the city level yes and gathering the knowledge gathering the knowledge and

Systematizing it is as important as the university of manchester is doing last but not least i mean work the work of member based membership based organizations such as iclay who develop tools and carry out projects um and also bring it bring the knowledge gain to the table in international processes are very important

So um back to the question what can we do as gi said we’ve been asking ourselves um what we can do and there are elements of all of all of these elements are a figure in our work to some extent we fortunately gained the support from bmz for a very short-term program and

This year to support five municipalities in three countries under bangladesh and mauritania to pilot a few approaches and the program runs only until the end of the year and so we decided on a few small approaches that is green recovery planning using the methodologies of gis of eclair and brazilian cities network

In one package to strengthen the resilience planning at the local level to pilot small-scale measures um that can be arguable uh can our arguable contribution towards screen recovery and to develop project proposals for funding pipelines basically the project is about learning how can we mainstream green recovery and broader resilience approaches into um

Into our own work better and we’ll put the methodology methodological learnings on our websites and um there’s a small advertisement break on the 13th 14th of october there will be a second webinar in this series where we will talk about this in more detail

But for now i’m very glad to be here and listen to the contributions of the speakers thank you very much thank you so much felix uh sujan kim uh sujin we’d love to hear from you thank you all right thank you so much uh and and thank you for inviting me um

Greetings from paris where i am based and while i put my slides on the screen um so since march 2020 at the oecd we have been monitoring how you know different cities university countries and beyond uh have been confronting the the pandemic and shaping their way out of it

Or i should say probably learning to live with it and emerging uh stronger from it um so today here i will focus on three main observations or questions let’s say the first one is uh how bad was the crisis for cities the second one is uh what are some of the things that

All cities are doing to overcome the crisis and should do about it and i’ll finish with the third question which is what still remains to to be done and the next steps so on the first question of how the the the crisis was um yesterday we are

Actually meeting in a context where the prospects for global growth and global recovery as a whole are actually much better than uh they were a few months ago in fact uh just two days ago the oecd published its updated projections for uh economic growth uh in 2021 and 2022

And in fact in many countries as you can see here we expect growth to be back uh somewhere between uh generally five percent and seven percent for this year uh potentially a bit less for next year but overall the the global picture is actually uh getting brighter

But uh the important point is that this recovery is actually extremely uneven uh both across uh different countries uh but also most importantly within uh countries because the crisis is actually hit in a very asymmetrical way and if you look at the map that appeared on the right

We estimate that the share of jobs that were at risk of disappearing due to lockdowns and all the related restrictions were um actually somewhere between 15 and 35 percent of jobs uh in uh in most overseas regions but uh this share was actually often higher in cities and particularly in

Large cities um especially those cities that were you know relying very heavily on for example tourism global trade retail etc the good news uh because there is good news is that cities were also uh generally much better equipped than more rural and remote regions to to address

The crisis due to a number of reasons but one example that i could uh black here is that they were overall digitally much more equipped and so they were able to maintain a good part of their economy uh through remote working so for example in the city of paris where i live we

Estimate that around half of jobs can be worked from home compared to let’s say only 30 percent in the region of bas normandy in france which is much more rural so all in all uh you of course cities have taken a really big blow from the

Crisis but they also have a very strong capacity and strong potential to uh to overcome it in many different ways now turning to my second point which uh is about you know how cities are addressing the crisis and this will be no secret to all of you

Uh since day one of the pandemic really you know mayors and their teams have been uh taking a myriad of different actions and some of them cannot be you know replicated exactly as such from one place to the other you always have to take into account the local context

But uh if we try to categorize them or to see what is really emerging as a common pattern across the different cities in northern city countries you could say that many of those actions are actually building on major transitions that were already underway before the pandemic but um got really accelerated and are

Aiming to build you know resilience in the long term not just with this crisis but also trying to better prepare cities for future crisis because sadly uh there will be uh many more so um one example of such a transition is of course the digital transition and how cities are aiming for

Uh a smart uh recovery so many cities have been investing in digital technologies and some of them have been particularly effective and pioneering in this field so for example seoul in korea had actually established a smart data hub before the the pandemic for other you know urban planning purposes

But was able to leverage this digital hub for you know contact tracing and to uh to monitor how the virus is spreading and to be able to to warn people so many other cities are also now investing or accelerating their investments in uh digital technologies

Uh to be able to you know design this smarter recovery out of the crisis a second transition is of course the the climate transition the green uh transition and basically going towards low carbon and more circular economy in cities so a very visible example is this momentum

Uh for softer uh types of urban mobility such as um cycling lanes that have uh you know liberated in many cities and there are sometimes even called corona lanes in some cities such as in paris i certainly see a lot of those slanting lanes but more generally cities are really

Transitioning and shifting towards you know different types of more sustainable urban development uh including sometimes shifting the way that citizens are consuming and trying to you know consume more locally so for example fresh produce that was produced locally in the rural areas immediately surrounding those big cities

And a third type of transition that i wanted to flag here which is perhaps a little bit less uh talked about but uh i think the crisis has really shown a very harsh light on this uh uh transition uh it’s it’s really uh about the inequalities and how the

Crisis has shown how unequal we are within cities for example in terms of our housing conditions you know our capacity to shift and digitally and to use technologies and also how vulnerable small businesses are compared to to bigger ones and so many cities have been you know providing targeted support to

The most vulnerable parts of the city most vulnerable citizens and businesses and they’re now trying to mainstream this into their broader urban strategy and so for example you’ve got examples in in vienna for example for social housing or frankfurt supporting smes and so uh all these actions are

Really trying to make cities a better fit for future shocks and when you weave these three big types of transitions and actions together you really have to revisit the the urban vision and the long-term strategy for development and a few uh examples that i wanted to show here um are

Actually focused on this uh concept of proximity and um and accessibility so how you know cities are trying to make uh goods and services and opportunities just more accessible to people in a radius of uh you know 10 minutes as in brussels or 15 minutes as in paris

Uh 20 minutes as in melbourne um but basically these are visions that were not necessarily developed uh with the pandemic in many cases like in melbourne and and the others they were developed before the pandemic but uh with the kobe 19 crisis these regions these visions

Are really coming to the fore and are gaining momentum to refocus the vision for development uh but of course there is still a long way to go for cities and this is my third and final point uh because we can’t wait of course to be done with the kobe 19 pandemic to

Address all those emergencies tackling cities the climate emergency the inequalities emergency the housing crisis etc and one of the frameworks that i think can really help cities you know keep track of those different challenges different objectives within a coherent strategy is really the sustainable development goals and cities do have a

Critical role to play here uh in fact we estimate that 65 of the sdg targets will not be achieved without uh this active engagement from uh cities and and local governments uh and in this respect the oecd metrics that we have on where do we stand where do our city

Stand uh in terms of uh achieving the sdgs uh show unfortunately that there is a lot of distance to go to to meet uh those targets and cities here i i just put the example of bonn uh courtesy of the gen zed um and so where you see you know in blue

Dots uh the where the the city of bun is uh is standing and how much ground we still have to cover so in a nutshell uh to conclude cities have done you know above and beyond of course uh they do have a lot of potential to

Uh overcome the crisis and to help you know their country as a whole recover from the crisis but there is still quite a lot of work to to be done and this is what we are trying to do to help cities at the oecd so we are providing this targeted support to

Different cities and regions so if your own city is interested in engaging with us please don’t hesitate of course to to get in touch and i’ll finish here i really look forward to hearing more about the specific examples of cities and experiences that we have on this panel so thank you so much

Thank you so much sujan i’ll hand it off to dr andrew mcclelland from the university of manchester and andrew looking forward to hearing from you well thank you very much uh for the introduction and kind invitation to speak on today’s event uh good afternoon um everyone i’m working at the university of manchester

But based in neighboring liverpool and i’m currently a member of the interview interdisciplinary team working on the recovery renewal and resilience project as i mentioned based at the university of manchester but we’ve really been working with a broad range of multi-sexual partners across the world since the project officially began in in

January of this year in terms of today’s presentation i really just want to give you a brief glimpse at some of the outworkings of our project to date and talk about some of the range of activities and outputs that we’ve been engaged with developing this is an ongoing project running until

The summer summer of 2022 so clearly a lot of research still has to be undertaken a lot of analysis will obviously emerge from that nonetheless as you can see from the infographic on the screen and two of our broad overarching focal points and i will briefly touch upon today and you can see

Under those a really broad range of activities that we’ve been involved in to date and obviously by the end of the project those will have multiplied significantly today i will focus on both the manchester briefing and also on our work on developing a recovery framework and much of our work has really been

Focused on um local governments and local agencies around the world as they think towards the recovery from the pandemic in terms of the manchester briefing obviously we’ve been delighted to partner with the resilient cities network in the rapid dissemination of lessons relating to response and recovery in the

Context of the pandemic and obviously the manchester briefing has been one of the key vehicles through which we have sought to rapidly disseminate these lessons around the world in terms of the original incarnation of the manchester briefing we’ve now launched 42 of these and since the culvert crisis began

And we like to think um that the manchester briefings have really greatly assisted local governments and other agencies in terms of thinking towards their recovery uh their recovery and renewal efforts to date we have almost 600 lessons and since the summer those lessons have been gathered together

In an online database which is fully searchable and available for anyone to access around the world and i will give you the link to that database in the final slide another key aspect of the project has been thinking about um through some of our wider empirical research in particular the type of development

Of multi-dimensional frameworks that can really aid um local agencies as they think about their strategies for recovery you can see on the screen uh one of the framework that we have been developing um and this is something which we believe can really assist those um who are designing and also

Implementing their recovery plans and renewal strategies so this is very much being developed through our desktop our empirical research and various activities that we have undertaken with a whole range of partners um around the world i won’t go into particular detail in relation to this framework but you can see um really six

Principal domains illustrated and highlighted on the screen and these really represent uh as emergent from our work key impact and potential recovery and renewal action areas around which um such efforts can be centered by local government and other agencies clearly a lot of nuance and interpretation would be required in implementing the

Framework in local contexts and obviously we are aware of that and as we’ve been developing the framework this framework also helps structure the manchester briefing database and so you will see a number of lessons later on highlighted relating to each of these domains if we’re thinking then um in terms of

Some of those lessons on focal points i’ve had the opportunity myself but as well as other members of our team uh to talk with a number of experts around the world in relation to their response on recovery activities and that has included of course resilience officers

From from many cities so if we consider for example those cities that have produced in the past resilient strategies and how are those resilient strategies and the network itself has helped in informing recovery and renewal efforts during the pandemic i think this slide really just draws out three of those particular

Ways in which those resilient strategies have informed recovery you can also obviously see the front cover of the really excellent toolkit for resilient recovery and that really echoes much of what resilience officers and others have been saying to us so three of these particular areas which i won’t focus on

In detail but i think it’s worth just just elaborating briefly so resilience officers for example have talked about the importance of assessing and analyzing so for example applying and adapting the various tools and approaches such as impact assessments social mapping of vulnerable people scenario and action planning they’ve also talked about the

Utilization of data and intelligence in terms of working towards their recovery planning and using their pre-existing resilience strategies to inform that so because of the existence of a resilient strategy for example uh those studies were well placed to prioritize recovery actions and also then use that as a basis to access resourcing

Particularly from national governments so for example one resilience officer based in the united states talked about having already identified a lot of the vulnerabilities and bearing in mind that those vulnerabilities were already there before the clovid crisis emerged whether around the financial stress of individuals and households whether around housing and homelessness or

Whether or not around food security those particular needs were already there but clearly they’ve been exposed further and exacerbated in the context of the pandemic and through our conversations it’s also been apparent and that that many of the people involved in bringing together these recovery plans and renewal initiatives i’ve also leveraged those

Pre-existing partnerships and networks and so that has enabled them through kind of agile processes and to use these relationships established pre-pandemic to use the knowledge transfer networks and to use them these tools such as the manchester briefing or the oecd excellent work around policy tracking to take on board

These good practices during the crisis as they have been disseminated online in particular if we think then about one of the particular lessons that we have covered in in the manchester briefing one concerns a circular economy for example and considering how to invest in a circular economy to promote healthier and more

Resilient cities i again won’t go into detail but you’re seeing two particular recovery plans that have been published one from christchurch in new zealand and the other from manchester that obviously talk about and the circular economy and how actions will be centered around the circular economy in relation to

Implementing their recovery plans and again that is something that the resilient cities network for example uh has touched upon in various resources and briefings online including the infographic that i show on the screen and to move them towards my final slide before wrapping up the presentation another lesson it was just featured on

Our most recent um manchester briefing last week and this i guess speaks to some of the challenges um that many cities around the world will face in relation to the implementation of their recovery plans and renewal initiatives and this particular lesson relates to funding models and necessity for those cities local governments etc

And also national governments in terms of enabling uh to consider new funding models to increase um the opportunities for city recovery and resilience and this particular lesson draws upon a uen habitat report which talks about as you can see on the slide the need for a changing financial model from today’s system

Based on essentially changing that pyramid where presently much of the city government funding city funding will will come and will be based on intergovernmental transfers from national government but really turning out on its head to try to ensure that cities have greater opportunities to to generate their own revenues in future in

Order to really push forward more transformative processes in relation to recovery from the pandemic and thinking about those kind of renewal initiatives that try to address some of those underlying inequalities so this represents but one of the critical challenges i think that we face in co-designing a resilient recovery

So thank you very much for your attention thank you so much andrew that’s really exciting um and and very informative lessons um liara uh are you you’re up next are you ready to present thank you good afternoon everybody and thank you for the invitation from on behalf of the municipality of milan

Okay here we are so i’m idaya giuliani and i’m the deputy chief resilience officer of the municipality of milan i work with the piero pelicara city resilient department that is part of the environmental transition department we are here at city resident department after the party of milan won the 100 division city

Competition uh promoted by rockfell foundation back in 2015 and then the municipality decided to create the department we of course have been working through the years on the resilience strategy and of course like all the municipality let’s say in different ways all around the world i’ve been working on the

Possibility of the chance to update our resilient strategy uh in the light of the dynamic and kobe 19. so we have been working on let’s say different different topic that are part of the resilient strategies but there are as well other there are strategic pillar as well of other big strategies and

Plans for the city of milan here you can see three main topics on which the let’s say the resilient strategy based on and on which is based as well the adaptation strategy the municipality decide to develop after during the pandemic not after so as i was saying we as citizens the

Brazilian department are part of a bigger department which is called environmental transition department which is quite new since it has been created within the municipality in 2019 and we are part of this department together with the climate and energy area and together with the water resources and environmental hygiene area

So we these three let’s say areas are working together towards the implementation of the environmental transition process the municipality has been starting in within the within we work keeping our mind let’s say this goal this objective there are equity accessibility renaturalization decarbonization and active participation so our main let’s say a resilient methodology

In refers to the possibility to overlap different goals and different objectives that are of course related to the solutions to the climate change challenges that we all have to face but as well we are trying to overlap the topic of environment and the topic of sustainability sustainability

Together with a more let’s say social and economic perspective in particular looking at the the possibility to solve the issue of inequalities that are part as well of the urban development of the city of milan so that’s why we consider as well very much equity and accessibility in terms of services but

As well active participation take into consideration what citizens need as i was saying the municipality of milan during the pandemic decided to publish an adaptation strategy that is called a strategy a document adaptation strategy and we publish this let’s say in maybe may 2020 and we keep this adaptation strategy

Open to collect comments of citizens again that’s why we consider active participation of citizens so citizens during the pandemic during the lockdown eat milan but as well all italy was was facing we asked citizens to to give up to give us our their their feedbacks and those feedbacks has been taken into

Consideration in this adaptation strategy here you see which are the main pillars of this adaptation strategy and and i was saying this pillar has been um let’s say developed within this document but starting from the strategies that were related to this topic in already existing plans of the municipality that’s why we there

Was we decided to uh to use this kind of chronological uh aspect this timeline in order to consider which were which are the main relation between the adaptation strategies for kovi 19 and other strategic strategic documents of the municipality of milan the the key point was that we were

Considering our plans as a real starting point to reconsider uh strategies and action and real action to face pandemic that’s why we decided to use the pgt the piano the strategic land use plan of the city rather than the poems which is the plans related to

Mobility then we get we went through the adaptation strategy and we included within this plan as well the resilient strategy and as well the climate and their plan and we came we we used those plans to uh rescale the actions they were thought for let’s say ordinary situation

To manage the city and we scale those actions in order to reconsider them in the light of kobe 19. here you see which is the structure of the resilience strategy we as city resident department has been been working on in the last year there is a strategy is based on three main

Pillars the first one is related to services and push and procedure so how we can uh imagine and implement new tools for implementing resilience but as well for urban regeneration for instance the second pillar is related to spaces and infrastructure so how we can promote and implement a new

Public spaces within the city public spaces that can be more adaptive to our changing conditions and the third pillar is related to community and population so again how we can take into consideration inequality how we can face them how we can take into consideration as much as we can needs

Of citizens of our milanese citizens so we took this structure of the resilience strategy and we applied as i said this structure within the adaptation documents and some action actually came out and i will give you some example in few minutes another strategic plan we decided to consider in order to

Develop the adaptation strategy strategy for kobe 19 is the air and climate plan which is now under approval by the city council so the plan as the the let’s say it is considered very much strategic since if it has the capability to overlap strategies for mitigation to climate

Change for adaptation to climate change but as well for strategies related to the quality of air it’s the first time that the municipality develops develop a tool like this a plan like this and it’s based again on five big automatic pillar one is slow milano which is related to mobility of course

The other one is positive energy milano that is correlate of course related to the use of energy more efficient use of energy in the prospective of become a carbon neutral city the third one is related to cool milano so how we can rename re-naturalize the city how we can develop more green areas

Within the city the fourth one is related to inclusive milan so again how we can provide a city that take into consideration as much as it can um citizens and their needs and the fifth one is related to informed citizens so how we can implement the environmental transition process together with citizens

So we took this structure and we analyzed very much in details or in details all the actions that were included in these five strategic pillars and we use those actions in order to again update them in the light of coving 19 and this is let’s say more or less the structure of the

Milano 2020 adaptation strategy of course you need to consider that this strategy has been developed during the lockdown and as i said we left citizens the chance to commence and give their feedback to this adaptation strategy so we review it take into consideration there are comments

It’s based on this let’s say five topics five pillar again governance rights and inclusions and against again the topic of equity and accessibility uh the economic resources and value pillars the the pillars are related to labor and job opportunities of course the pillar related to sustainability and again all the work we

Have done with our resilience department and with our zinnia strategies was included within this sealer and the topic of timing spaces and services i will give you some example of the some action that we that we included within this adaptation strategy but again as i said you need to consider that we

Developed this document during the doc the lockdown but uh trying to um say uh have a vision as well on uh the the possible um let’s say future that that would have come after the lockdown at least here in milan and in italy so we try to consider of course a

Necessity need of plants and let’s say organize a post lock down phase but as well to consider the fact that of course the pandemic would have some impacts on our everyday life for several years so we are dealing within our strategy and especially within the adaptation adaptation strategy we are

Dealing with the new phase that we call new ordinary so measure there are need to be planned and implemented for somehow a new normality very quickly just to give you some example of practical action we included within the adaptation strategy the program please support so starting from the fact that citizens

Because of the pandemic need more public space they can use we open up some new squares within the city removing cars and installing some benches and greenery we decide to reduce the space for cars in order to implement much more bicycle lanes on big streets here you

See some example and in the last year we developed 45 kilometers or new of new bike lanes and this is again this is a way to give back the public space the city to citizens we let commercial activities expand their spaces within the public space again we

Remove car from the streets in order to have more sidewall sidewalk and pedestrian areas where we can have green spaces or we can have spaces for commercial activities for bar and restaurants again we left bars and restaurants using an occupy public space in order to encourage the use of the

Of the everyday life in the open air and last but not least we gave back give back the streets uh removing cars to play to children in order to for them to have extraordinary spaces for both for playing but as well for school activities since schools were closed uh till this september

I think this was the last example thank you very much thank you so much it’s so really exciting to see how the city has reimagined and redesigned public space as a result of the pandemic and it’s something we’ve seen in a lot of our cities

Um nasmul i’d like to pass the mike on to you to help wrap up the panel thank you uh nazmul i think you’re still on mute just checking yes uh thank you sorry for the technical problem it happens sometime so thank you very much and my apologies for the delay of for this

Technical problem so good morning good afternoon and good evening everyone and my name is nasmul hawk and i’m leading the eclipse resilient development program based in born in one world secretariat and uh many of you already know that it is one of the biggest local government organizations having the membership of a 2500

Cities towns and regions under its underage membership and the way we work we work very closely with the local political leadership to develop our uh vision and guidance so that is why i am also working as the portfolio liaison uh with three of the advisors uh who we all

Who also advising us to define our political vision and leadership so one of our advisor is a mayor manuel our second political uh co-chair is uh mrs atishi marlena who is from a member of national capital territory of tilly and also our advisor is mr idris arun from malachi state government of malaysia

So the reason that i am introducing it because from our side at italy we see resilience is not a very much technical issue rather it’s a combination of technical and political ambition and being uh today by by these presentation i am going to introduce some of the snapshots and approaches and

Activities of weekly how we are working with our with our member cities towns and reasons to develop the resilient their resilience profile their resilience as well as uh help them to raise their climate ambitions and also keeping green recovery and green approach and development at the very core of their

Development overall development and resilience policies so that is why our approach is very much of course local to global and we always intentionally keep it local to global in terms of our resilience development strategies it is because resilience is very much contextualized and there cannot be any kind of global metric of

Resilience as opposed to mitigation or net zero carbon targets so resilience is very complex and we are we have very firm commitment to all of our members it is not only to all of our member cities but also other cities and towns and regions to raise their ambition for for

For to to make a resilient towns and cities for them so one of the major major entry points we see that that has been defined by paris climate agreement which is global goal of adaptation and subsequently resilient but when we want to perform the global goal of adaptation

And resilience it has to be defined what resilience look like contextually in that part in that particular context or what capabilities the local government should should have or they they require to develop their resilience profile or how we can develop the local government metrics and and and what

Instruments should be used to track and report progress at the global level so that is how we are here we are connecting uh we are trying to answer all these questions and making a connection of resilience who is connect cities from local level to global level in terms of

Which can also contributing to develop what we call a global global goal of adaptation and resilience so in doing so what we are offering as a tool for the cities that is what we call green climate cities program which is of course beyond climate change and it also

Very much inclusive that that is that is developed as a process methodology that helps us to understand even for the cities where we are in terms of our vulnerability in terms of our risk as well as in terms of our stock taking up capacities capacity needs and everything then we also

The part of the methodologies also includes like uh what should we do in terms of act what we need to do in in in to to meet all the all the problems that that we have identified in the earlier stage it can include that we will define redefine our approach it

Can include that we will re define our institutional setup and everything and etc then thirdly our approach is also advocating to accelerate means where should we go how should we go and this approach this approach is very much inclusive that offers tailor-made solutions in suggestion to the needs of

Cities towns and regions across the globe and it helps cities to connect with the wider level of actors and institutions to meet their different level of needs and demands so i can also show you two brief very brief examples how these tools are very much uh helping cities to

Raise their climate ambition and actions but also uh towards the end when the uncertainties um uncertainties took place like kovit that these frameworks also helps them to to to to stand against the covet and embrace the challenges for example as one of the local actions that we where we applied this framework

To cities in bangladesh under the urban led project one city is called narayan guns and second cities called russia where we have applied this framework and we identified what are the fragilities in their urban systems from different perspectives as i said the tool offers a very much inclusive view of what we need

And what we have and what we need to do so you see how the fragile advanced system definition of travel r1 system helps those cities subsequently to develop their resilience plan secondly these uh once we identified through this framework that what is what where we are

And what we need that it also help us to to fill up the gap for example now as perhaps we you have already heard from the other other other um colleagues that we have been implementing a project through partnership with resilience cities and with gis from the funding from the bmj

A project called recap where we particularly address those gaps through green recovery and and greener process for example in recap 21 project we added uh solar street lighting in front of health centers for enhanced safety and security at night at the same time these utilization of this framework also

Helped us to take a pilot project to improve water and electricity accessibility in health care centers and if in effect what the benefits we got it’s also helped cities to to develop their adaptation profile to develop their resilience profile in form of rainwater harvesting mitigating the

Water shortage but at the same time it also has helped them to decrease the cost of lighting reduce energy cost in the long term generate local revenue and reduce and avoid greenhouse gas emissions so this is how an innovative and an inclusive local level approach from italy really helped to include the

Green recovery philosophies and activities inside an overarching resilient development framework so now our our target as we said that bringing these lessons to a global level so that we can we can have a global level of understanding how resilience should work and what contextualities we we should consider and as a as of

Three of our main approaches you can see here on the screen that we are very much very much a proud member of cities race to resilience where we are leading one particular initiative called cities race to resilience and these races are being uh promoted by the climate champions and we are very much

Proud that uh these we are we are part of this part of this races again we are also very much a founding partner of ncr 2030 which is uh forwarded by undrr and also we are a member of global covenant of mayors one of the biggest organizations as well on

Adaptation and resilience so these organizations are some of the vehicles through which we are also transferring lessons we are reporting data and everything so that local level uh actions local level uh best practices and partnerships can be easily transferable and be reported to make a global goal of adaptation and

Resilience so this is my short take here and i’m very much grateful again for the opportunities and for the more information please feel free to contact us thank you very much and have a nice evening and nice afternoon i’m so thank you very much for all this information this material that i think

Will be very useful for many of us of course the clay is really a a great contributor to this to this agenda of resilience i’m not sure i don’t think we’ll have time for a question and answer but i still would like to get everybody on back on screen um i

And maybe say a few words about the presentation i must say sojin i was really i love your your your almost your slogan of smart green and inclusive because i think that summarize what we all aspire to in in this recovery program one thing that struck me

In what you said and that i think everybody mentioned in one way or another is that most of the of this recovery program built on work done before the crisis right these are not the result of a certainly certain interest in resilience the crisis certainly helped advance some of these efforts but

They they really build on foundation that they’ve been laid over the years by organizations like uk like rcm like others were present here today andrew you also mentioned that very much a lot of these the vulnerability that a merger in crisis existed before very often isis just brings them to the fore and

Makes them realized and uh ellaria you you showed very well how you really built on the multitude of plans that then allowed for uh for the the current recovery plan to to to emerge i think another element that everybody underscores the importance of uh inclusivity of consultation in those

Plans and that the plants that work best are the ones that that really are done in a consultative manner now you can only i mean all these plants and we know it from experience are done on an accelerated process right it may take time to get this investment through

But they usually are done extremely quickly and unless there’s all these foundations in place that can allow for a consultative process to to take place in a fairly a fairly quick pace it’s very difficult to build uh to build some of these uh plans and i i think i’m so you you

Put your finger on the crux of the matter that you know the multiple dimension to resilience and in fact resiliency is not just a technical problem it’s a political one that is built uh over the years uh and again credit to to everybody present and especially some of the

Organizations who have been supporting this agenda then i’m going to pass it back to you it’s 9 57 so i’ll leave it to you to close uh unfortunately without that question but i think we’re happy to put you in touch with the speakers and we’re happy to facilitate dialogue

To anybody who wants to who wants to get connected thank you very much to all the speakers and to other participants thank you so much francis um i wanted to take this opportunity to uh again once again thanks uh thank felix dollar as well and giz uh for their partnership and investment

In this really important work of really learning from cities how to plan for a resilient recovery and so again we have been very excited to be part of this process with iklee and giz to really go deep in a few a few cities um in bangladesh and rwanda and mauritania

And to really learn uh some you know how cities are approaching recovery in different and new ways and in this smart green equitable and multi-sectoral ways um so thank you again felix thank you again to all the speakers and the panelists uh we i wanted to remind everyone that

Within the next week all of the the you know the materials from the session will be available online so if you’re interested in in going back to the slides and and this recording of the session that will be available within the week and i wanted to invite you all to rejoin

Us on october 14th for the next session where we will be continuing this theme and diving deeper into some of the findings from this recap 21 program and some of um i think nasmul gave us a taste of some of the projects that are emerging uh from from this work and

We’ll be going deeper into the learnings of from those projects and talking about um how cities are designing and also financing these projects and and coming up with new and innovative ways to approach recovery so please join us again for part two of this conversation and thank you again for all being here

With us today uh we look forward to seeing you on october 15th thank you and have a pleasant evening and day bye-bye bye-bye thank you all right thank you everyone take care

ID: x6aEzQHNbCQ
Time: 1632761947
Date: 2021-09-27 20:29:07
Duration: 00:59:58

منبع